Op-Ed: On-street parking fees despite zero public transport?

Can on-street parking fees really help places with poor public transport?

I was asked this many times in Pune, India, while I was there on mission three weeks ago*. Parking is a hot topic in this Maharashtra city of about 5 million people because many Pune streets have extreme parking problems and because the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) has a new and progressive draft parking policy awaiting approval. However, public transport in Pune remains unappealing for vehicle owners. Hence the question.

The short answer is yes! 

By Paul Barter, Adjunct Associate Professor, LKY School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore

Double parking and parking on footways are common sights on Pune’s FC Road.

* The original  posting of this article appeared in Reinventing Parking, June 28, 2017

Well-designed on-street parking fees can help regardless of the state of public transport. 

Don’t get me wrong. Public transport is important. I think it deserves a very high priority in urban transport planning. And it does help parking management to have a good transit alternative, not least because the politics of on-street parking fees tends to be a little easier if public transport is strong.

Nevertheless, it is still true that on-street parking fees can work most of their magic without the help of public transport.

Here is an example:  Saudi Arabia’s cities have very little public transport. Yet these before-and-after shots highlight the visible benefits of implementing on-street parking fees (along with improved enforcement, of course) in several downtown streets in Jeddah.

A slide by Andrew Perrier of Mawgif (the company that implemented Jeddah’s downtown on-street pricing) from his presentation at the 2nd Annual Parking Management Conference, Singapore, Feb. 2017 (used with permission)

But how can this be?

Don’t motorists need a good public transport alternative before they can change their parking behaviour? Actually no.

Public transport is just one of many options open to motorists faced with new or increased on-street parking fees.

The number one way that well-planned on-street fees help is by persuading some motorists to change their parking LOCATIONS.

In a training event in Pune I had the participants do a simple hands-on simulation of parking in and around a small commercial area.

  • We simulated car arrivals and departures across a weekday morning.
  • Participants used stickers to “park” the simulated cars on the map of the area and to mark the spaces empty again when cars leave.
  • The participants had JUST ONE CHOICE to make: where to park that car. Their options were off-street (in either the core area or nearby) and on-street (legal in the core area, illegal in the core area or legal in the surrounding quieter residential area).

We ran the simulation twice:

  1. with weak parking management (almost zero enforcement; on-street parking free-of-charge; priced off-street parking, albeit with low fees)
  2. with strong on-street parking management (decent enforcement; on-street parking fees but only in the commercial core area; off-street parking fees as before; the on-street fees in the core are higher than the off-street fees in the same area).

Can you guess how it turns out?

Without fail, every group gets results that look something like this.   [BTW, blue is the colour for commercial on Indian zoning maps.]

Weak parking management results in all-day parking hogging most of the prime on-street spaces in the commercial area. Off-street spaces were usually little used. Illegal on-street parking was common.

Strong parking management always resulted in all-day parking in the residential periphery and off-street, leaving the prime on-street spaces for short-term parking with high turnover. Off-street parking became well used and illegal on-street parking became a rare event.

 Many participants were astonished that such simple policy changes made so much difference.

The simulation has limitations but I hope participants became a little more willing to believe that on-street parking management can often ease parking problems without the need for more off-street parking.

Notice that these striking results were achieved without any mode shifts. 

All we did was use on-street fees and enforcement to nudge most all-day parking to off-street options and/or to quieter streets where parking demand is lighter.

Of course, in reality, some motorists do respond by changing travel mode (to walking, biking, motorcycle, taxi, ride-hail, family drop off, or even to public transport). And any such mode shift will be a help. Parking location shift is usually the primary parking management result but it is not the only one.

Mode shift is usually not essential to on-street parking management

You can achieve a lot with well-planned on-street parking fees without any shift to public transport.

In fact, parking management can often drastically ease parking problems (like illegal parking, double parking, cruising for parking and complaints of shortage) even if no-one at all changes travel mode.

So please don’t wait for excellent public transport before deploying on-street parking fees as a key parking management tool!

*  My trip to Pune was supported by GIZ’s Sustainable Urban Transport Project (SUTP)</a> and the workshop was organized by ITDP India’s excellent Pune team.  Many thanks to both!

 

# # #

About the author:

Paul Barter is a transport policy researcher, adviser, writer and trainer. He has wide-ranging paul-barter-head-shotexpertise but is increasingly focused on municipal parking policy. He was principal researcher and author of the Asian Development Bank’s 2011 report, ‘Parking Policy in Asian Cities’ and has provided parking policy insight and training in various Asian cities. He is also an Adjunct Associate Professor in the LKY School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore (NUS). Find more of his writing on urban transport via www.reinventingtransport.org. Learn more about his parking ideas at www.reinventingparking.org.

# # #

About the editor: 

Eric Britton
9, rue Gabillot, 69003 Lyon France

Bio: Britton is an American political scientist and sustainability activist who has lived and worked in Paris since 1969. Professor of Sustainable Development, Economy and Democracy at the Institut Supérieur de Gestion (Paris), he is also MD of EcoPlan Association, an independent advisory network providing strategic counsel for government and business on policy and decision issues involving complex systems, social-technical change and sustainable development. Founding editor of World Streets, his latest book, "BETTER CHOICES: Bringing Sustainable Transport to Your City" focuses on the subject of environment, equity, economy and efficiency in city transport and public space, and helping governments to ask the right questions. A pre-publication edition of Better Choices is currently undergoing an international peer review during Sept.- Oct. 2017, with the goal of publication in English and Chinese editions by end-year. If you wish to participate drop a line to BetterChoices@ecoplan.org .

View complete profile

 
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s