Post Velo-City 2017 Op-Ed: On the need to re-connect cycling discourses with its core values

 –  Esther Anaya-Boig,  Doctoral researcher at Imperial College London

I have just returned from the latest Velo-city Global Cycling Summit organized this year in Arnhem-Nijmegen, The Netherlands. The best part of the conference experience for me was that it gave me an opportunity to catch up with so many old friends and making new ones who share my deep interest in cycling as a mobility form and as a social act.

I appreciate the hard work and good intentions of the many many people who have contributed and made this event possible. However upon considerable reflection on what I saw and heard during the three days of the conference and associated events, I would now like to share some views and reactions, with all due respect of course.

For an introduction to the conference and the program to   – https://www.velo-city2017.com/

During my three days in Nijmegen I have seen, listened and read a lot about business, high technology and growth.

I have been told that the bicycle has to be fast (e.g. cycle highways), reduce congestion, contribute to economic growth, raise the status of its users. Strangely though, it appeared that many anachronistic car-culture concepts were being applied airily to the bicycle.

Furthermore, the sheer benevolence of  the role and impact autonomous vehicles, smart cities, electric mobility, economic growth was taken for granted.

However I am afraid that the future scenarios envisaged solely and so uncritically with these concepts have nothing to do with Utopia, especially for specific (large) groups of people.

It has been frustrating and disappointing to be exposed to these uncritical discourses, now that we know so much more about the fundamental  flaws in our mobility systems and the history of car culture, its power abuse and consequences.

It is the responsibility of all of us who care not to ignore this. I think it is time well past to take a step back and re-connect cycling discourses with its core values.

How would these discourses change if we bore in mind the connection of the bicycle with well-being (from physical activity to mental health), nature and environment, social equity (gender, age, disabled people, lower income groups, migrants and refugees, all ethnicities and faith groups,…)?

What would happen to this discourse once we recognised that our dominant economic models simply do not fit in our finite, wounded earth?

What if we reconsidered the right to be slow, to give ourselves space and time to be aware of things happening, to allow us to connect with people and the environment? I believe these values should be the cornerstones of a conference like this, and should be ubiquitous and carefully respected in each of the presentations of the conference.

It would have been great to have more of these debates and others.  But apart from a few exceptional sessions, in this year’s Velo-City I painfully missed this year such thoughtful considerations of the subjects and disciplines that touch upon them: sociology, anthropology, behavioral psychology,  humanities and the arts .

I ask you this:

Is it possible to shift gears now and move toward a more critical, inclusive and affordable Velo-city? Or is it perhaps a matter of moving these deeper debates to other spaces?

# # #

Selected comments to follow

# # #

About the author

Esther Anaya-Boig specialised in cycling mobility since her final dissertation for Bachelor of Science in Environmental Sciences in 2004 (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, UAB). From there, she spent 10 years working in cycling advocacy groups and consultancies while adding graduate and postgraduate training in Cultural Studies and Mobility.  Since 2014, she is a doctoral researcher at Imperial College London in impact evaluation of cycling policies on cyclists’ behaviour.

# # #

About the editor

 

Eric Britton
9, rue Gabillot, 69003 Lyon France

Bio: Trained as a development economist, Eric Britton is a public entrepreneur specializing in the field of sustainability and social justice. Professor of Sustainable Development, Economy and Democracy at the Institut Supérieur de Gestion (Paris), he is also MD of EcoPlan Association, an independent advisory network providing strategic counsel for government and business on policy and decision issues involving complex systems, social-technical change and sustainable development. Founding editor of World Streets, his latest work focuses on the subject of equity, economy and efficiency in city transport and public space, and helping governments to ask the right questions -- and in the process, find practical solutions to urgent climate, mobility, life quality and job creation issues. More at: http://wp.me/PsKUY-2p7

View complete profile

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s